Although the MITS
Altair 8800 was the first practical personal microcomputer and
started the industry, credit for spreading the personal computer
revolution must go to another company_IMS
Associates and its product, the Imsai
8080 computer. While it was not strictly a clone of the Altair,
this machine adopted the bus structure of the Altair and used
interchangeable plug-in circuit boards. This commonality and
the availability of the Imsai assured
the dominance of the Altair (S-100) Bus.
IMS Associates was
started by William Millard as a computer consulting company,
whose most important consulting project was the development
of a computer system for an automobile dealer. In an effort
to reduce costs, Millard became interested in the new microprocessor
chips being manufactured by Intel, and the possibility of networking
many of them into a powerful computer system he called Hypercube.
When the Altair
article broke in Popular
Electronics, Millard and his associates tried to order
some Altairs to try out this idea. They immediately ran into
two problems. First, MITS wanted payment in advance, and second,
they couldn't promise to deliver the order for at least 90 days.
IMS Associates couldn't get the money unless they could show
their customer that they had a solution to the problem, and
they couldn't wait 90 days. Millard did manage to borrow an
Altair to examine, and he and his associates became convinced
that such a microcomputer represented
the best solution to their problem, and the Altair 8800 was
not a commercial piece of equipment by any criteria. Since the
only other choice they had was a much more expensive minicomputer,
with an even longer delivery time, they decided to build a copy
of the Altair. Having made the decision to build their own 8080
computer, IMS Associates decided to correct the obvious defects
of the Altair and build a rugged commercial grade machine.
The most glaring
defect of the Altair was the location of the expansion motherboards.
MITS used a standard Optima case to house the computer, and
its shape dictated the mounting position of the motherboards.
This in turn caused the board mounting connectors to face the
side of the cabinet. As a result, the connections from the front
panel to the motherboard required a large cable. In addition
to making the computer kit harder to build, this cable was a
potential source of trouble over the life of the computer. IMS
Associates designed their own cabinet and made it much deeper
than wide. This allowed the Imsai
to be made with the motherboard perpendicular to the front panel
so that the front panel itself could be plugged into the first
connector on the motherboard. This eliminated the large connecting
cable.
The front panel
of the Altair used small toggle switches to program the computer
in binary machine language (ones and zeros were represented
by switches "on" or "off".) The Imsai
used the same arrangement but replaced the Altair's toggle switches
with heavy commercial-grade "paddle" switches. The plastic switch
"paddles" were colored red or blue. Mounted above the paddle
switches was a colorful plastic panel with the indicator lights
showing through. The name IMSAI 8080 was displayed in
the upper right-hand corner of the panel. To emphasize that
this indeed was a commercial-grade computer, the heavy aluminum
cover was painted what was then called "IBM Blue." In all, the
Imsai design was very impressive and
professional.
Once the Imsai cover was removed, you could see that the obvious
and most impressive difference between the Altair and the Imsai was the power supply. The Altair used a power
supply rated at 8-amps and constructed of radio grade components.
This was thought to be more than adequate for the original design
of the computer, but not for an expanded system. (MITS later
had to upgrade the power supply to allow for growth.) The Imsai
power supply, on the other hand, came equipped with a massive
transformer and very large computer-grade capacitors. The standard
model was rated at 20 amps, and for a small upgrade fee you
could get a huge 30-amp supply. This big power supply could
deliver 30 amps at 5 volts and 3 amps at + - 16 volts. Having
a large power supply was an advantage because all the S-100
Bus computers used un-regulated power supplies with power regulators
located on each individual circuit board. One of the most common
causes of failure in S-100 computers was failure of the on-board
power regulators. The use of massive transformers and capacitors
provided less electrical fluctuation and longer life for the
power regulators. In addition, larger power supplies provide
a reserve for later expansion.
For the computer
owner, selection of motherboards for the Imsai
was very important. The standard kit or assembled unit only
came with a 6-slot motherboard (2 more than the Altair), but
only two connectors. To expand the system, additional connectors
and 4-slot motherboards had to be added to the computer. Every
time you added a connector, you had to carefully solder 100
connector pins to the board. Whenever a motherboard section
was added, 100 wires had to be added. This required making 200
solder connections, and every solder connection was a potential
source of trouble. The Altair connectors were made with a
different pin spacing than the standard 0.125-inch Texas
Instruments connectors used by Imsai.
You could plug the same circuit board into either type of connector,
but the pins that went into the motherboard were spaced differently.
The Imsai connectors cost from $7 to $10 while the Altair
connectors cost $15 each and were harder to get.
Imsai offered a 22-slot
motherboard as a $52 option, when you ordered it with the computer.
This was the solution to the motherboard problem. If you installed
with at least 10 connectors, additional soldering seldom had
to be done. Word got around very fast, and almost everybody
ordered the Imsai with 22-slot motherboards and 10 connectors.
Like the Altair,
the Imsai kit only came with the front
panel board and the CPU board. No memory or input/output board
was provided. However, by the time the Imsai
was being shipped, there were several choices of memory boards
available. Imsai made an excellent 4K Static RAM board for $139
in kit form. Processor Technology had both 4K and 8K Static
Ram boards available, and even MITS had 8K Ram boards and a
new 4K Ram board that worked.
You really needed
about 16K of memory to load BASIC and generate programs with
usable data. You also had to have a working Input/Output (I/O)
board to get things in or out of the computer. I/O boards came
in either serial or parallel form, or both. One of the most
popular I/O boards was the 3P+S from Processor Technology, which
had both forms of I/O on one board. Imsai advertised that they were developing a super I/O
board called the Multiple I/O (MIO) Board, but it never seemed
to come out and was referred to as the "Missing I/O Board."
One most important
thing that MITS had over Imsai was
the BASIC written by Bill Gates of Microsoft, which was very
important because lack of a good BASIC made operation very difficult.
Imsai had little software
capability. The only software they supplied Imsai was a modified version of the Software #1 package,
written for Processor Technology and placed in the public domain.
This was delivered on a paper tape and required 8K of memory.
The software consisted of a executive
program, including a text editor and an assembler program for
assembly language. To use it, you had to have a teletype tape
reader. The procedure was not simple. First, you used the computer's
front panel switches to load in a bootstrap loader program,
one byte at a time.
Once the loader
was in memory, you could start the tape reader and load the
executive program from the tape. Now, you could use the keyboard
on the teletype to write an assembly program, and the executive
program could assemble it. If that worked, the result was object
code for your program, and it could be stored in RAM memory.
If you had enough memory, you could run your program. Then if
everything ran okay, you could store your program using the
punch on the teletype to make a new paper tape. The next time
you wanted to run the program, all you had to do was load the
object code paper tape back into memory and there you were.
Simple! This was not exactly what we today call "user friendly,"
and this is why having a higher level language like BASIC was
so important.
Imsai advertised both
4K and 8K BASIC but noted that this was under development and
would be available "real soon now." Imsai
owners did not wait; they got Altair (Microsoft) BASIC by hook
or by crook (mostly by buying it as a group and sharing it among
themselves.) Altair BASIC soon became the standard language
for personal computers even before Microsoft got out of its
restrictive agreement with Altair.
In spite of its
usefulness, the Teletype as an I/O device, printer, and mass
storage device was too expensive, too hard to get, and too hard
to use. The audio cassette interface was a much better choice.
Tape recorders were low in cost and easy to use. The problem
was that there was no standard interface, and tapes made with
one interface could not be read by another. The industry held
a meeting in Kansas City to develop a cassette tape standard,
but few adhered to it. Finally, because it worked the best,
the Tarbell Cassette Interface became
a de facto standard for S-100 computers, except for notable
exceptions like MITS and Processor Technology's SOL. Cassette
tape took over I/O functions from the paper tape punch and reader
until floppy disks became commonplace. Video terminals and low
cost printers also became available for microcomputers.
IBM had developed
the floppy disk to load software, and Altair, Imsai, and other companies were working to adapt it
for use on microcomputers. The development of floppy disks and
disk operating systems, plus cheap RAM memory, opened up the
industry for really useful software, and completed the transition
from hobbyist's toys to really useful computer systems.
Because of component
board interchangeability, almost no one ran a complete Imsai Computer System. The computer itself might be
an Imsai with its 8080 CPU, but even
that was likely to be a Z80 CPU from TDL, or Cromemco.
The memory could come from any of two dozen manufacturers. Seals
Memory were popular 8K boards as were Vector Graphic, IMS (not
related to Imsai), and Processor Technology. In 16K memory boards,
Cromemco and Processor Technology
were well thought of, as were TDL, Seals, IMS, and a few others.
The I/O board was most likely to be a 3P+S from Processor Technology
although George Morrow made a popular one and some people liked
the Vector Graphic. The computer terminal was likely to be a
Adam 3A or a Hazeltine 1500. Many
users saved money, and in place of a separate video terminal,
installed a Processor Technology Video Display Module (VDM)
and a keyboard. With this combination, they used the computer
itself as a terminal.
For data and program
storage, they often used the Tarbell
Cassette Interface before the advent of the floppy disk drive.
Imsai's first attempt at a "smart" floppy disk drive
was a total failure. Later, various disk drives from MITS, PertecPersi, North Star,
George Morrow, Micromation, and Cromemco were installed in Imsai computers. Imsai finally
did manage to come out with their own
working floppy disk unit. At first, all the floppy disks were
8-inch units and were very expensive. When the 5 1/4-inch floppy
disk drives came out, many computer owners who had not been
able to afford disk drives purchased them from Pertec,
North Star, and other companies.
One very important
thing that Imsai did to advance the
use of floppy disks was to license the best disk operating system,
later to be known as CP/M. In fact, it was money from the Imsai license that encouraged Gary Killdal to form Digital Research Incorporated and to
get into the CP/M operating system business.
While Imsai never became a successful systems house as did
Cromemco and others, the Imsai 8080 with its massive power supply and 22-slot
chassis was a foundation for almost any 8080 or Z-80 system
you could think of. Even Alpha Micro Systems used the Imsai for its first 16-bit multi-user systems.
From IMS Associates
to IMSAI Incorporated
The
company that developed the Imsai was
very different from the company which invented the MITS Altair.
Ed Roberts of MITS was a technical person who was propelled
into the leadership of a rapidly expanding computer company.
Bill Millard, on the other hand, was an entrepreneur who envisioned
the growth of his company into a vast computer utility. He was
a believer in the self-improvement techniques developed by Werner
Erhard, called "EST," which he attempted to apply to all situations.
EST convinced him that once he had made up his mind to do something
it was as good as done. He surrounded himself with people who
had "taken the training," and this was a big factor in the accomplishment
of bringing the Imsai to market in
record time. It was also a factor in the failure to test equipment
before releasing it to the market, and the inability to see
changes in the market as the technology advanced. Fortunately
for Imsai, in addition to Millard
and his "ESTheads" the company also
had the services of some of the best sales and marketing executives
in the industry, includingEd Faber, who built both Imsai
and Computerland, and Seymour Rubenstein, who founded MicroPro
the owner of WordStar software.
It
was said that MITS was an engineering company who did not know
how to build and market their products. Imsai,
on the other hand, was a marketing company who developed one
brilliant product and overexploited it. From the Imsai
8080 on, they never knew the difference between a prototype
and a production model, and never really had another successful
computer.
The Life and Death
of Imsai
When
the Imsai 8080 was in development
at IMS Associates, it looked like the company would run out
of money before the computer was completed. As a last resort,
Millard placed an ad in Popular Electronics Magazine, describing
the computer and offering it for sale as a kit. The ploy worked
beyond their wildest dreams. The computer hunger, fed by the
Altair articles and the inability of MITS to deliver, impelled
people to send in checks for the Imsai
8080 merely from the description in the small ads. Millard used
some of the money to prepare a professional ad campaign and
place ads in Byte and all the other computer magazines now appearing.
The stream of checks grew to a flood and people startedto
inquire about becoming dealers.
As owner
of the Computer Mart of New York, which was about to open, I
was one of the first people to contact IMS Associates. They
were very interested in selling in volume to dealers, but they
had priced the kits at $439, a price too low to provide for
dealer discounts. Quickly they raised the price to $499 and
allowed a discount of only 15% for orders of 10 or more computers.
This was still not enough margin to
allow a dealer to make a profit after paying his overhead, considering
the small quantity we could sell. Then Ed Faber came up with
a scheme that benefited both the company and the dealers. He
proposed that if we dealers could pay for the computers in advance,
we could get another 5% and IMS would pay the shipping cost.
For me that was the clincher; I sent off my check and prayed
that IMS Associates would make delivery on time. Little did
I know that I would get priority because Millard and Faber wanted
their computers on sale in New York where theywere trying
to raise capital.
Back
in San Leandro, the people in IMS
Associates went to work to build their first 50 kits to make
the initial shipments. By December 1975, they had shipped
the first lot and were at work on the second batch of 250 kits.
Ten of these were mine, and never had I sweated out anything
more than the arrival of those computers. I had exactly one
complete computer, one partial kit for the Sphere computer,
ten video monitors, one teletype, a
lot of books, assorted parts, chips, and connectors to open
a computer store with. We hoped to open March 1, 1976, but in
the middle of January five of my Imsais arrived and we couldn't wait to open. Not convinced
that we would ever make it, I had been looking for work and
had contracted to write a manual for the Warner Communications
Timesharing Service. We actually opened on New York's Fifth
Avenue in back of Polk's Hobby Department Store in February
1976 and started immediately selling Imsais.
Ed
Faber quickly saw the potential of the computer stores and took
IMS Associates (now called Imsai )
out of the direct sales business. Instead, he developed a plan
where a dealer had to commit to only 25 computers a year and
put up a deposit of $2,500. The discount was put at 25%, and
Imsai would ship on a C.O.D. basis
rather than requiring cash in advance. For us established dealers,
it was a great help. However, under this plan dealers sprouted
all over the place, in garages, lofts, and hardware stores.
In addition, the mail order discount dealers appeared, and people
started to bring in kits they had bought by mail but couldn't
put together.
At
the first big computer show held in Atlantic City, New Jersey,
on the weekend of August 27, 1976, Imsai
was not an exhibitor although MITS and every other company was
showing their products. However Ed Faber walked through the
show like a king. The truth was that there more Imsai
computers than any other make. Every retailer had Imsais,
as well as people selling boards and peripherals. In addition
there were heaps of Imsais piled up
and marked with bargain prices for sale at the show. Although
MITS was the biggest exhibitor at the show and they introduced
the new Altair B model, Imsai got the greatest attention
However,
I was one of the few dealers not showing Imsai
computers. Instead I had a brand new computer made on a single
board. It did not need a teletype because it had its own video
output to a TV set. It had a very fast cassette interface for
data storage, and it had its own version of BASIC that came
with the computer. It was called The Apple and it was being
shown in my booth by two young men from California, Steve Jobs
and Steve Wozniak. The Apple proved to be one of the hits of
the show. In addition to the Apple, the show introduced the
new Processor Technology SOL, the new Cromemco,
and the TDL Z-80 CPU board for the S-100 Bus.
Although
we did not realize it at this show, the handwriting was on the
wall for the Imsai 8080 as well as
the Altair. The new generation of computers was already here,
and within a year the SOL became my biggest seller, followed
by the Apple II a year later.
Imsai as a company tried to introduce
several new products as an upgrade to the 8080. One was the
"smart disk drive mentioned previously. It was a single sided
8-inch floppy disk drive originally set for introduction in
1976. The unit was released and shipped before it was completely
tested, and it proved to have all kinds of design problems.
When it did work for any length of time, it grew very hot and
generated heat to distort the diskettes. It quickly became known
as "The Imsai Pizza Oven" and was
quickly withdrawn from the market. The next version took over
a year to complete, although it was offered in the Imsai
catalog.
Another
product launched with an intensive advertising campaign was
the Imsai 8048 Control Computer. This was a single board
computer designed to control all kinds of electrical devices.
The 8048 computer worked, but priced at $200 to $400 it found
no market. Other devices such as the Commodore KIM-1 were much
more versatile and cost only half as much.
In
addition to the declining market for Imsai
8080 computers, and the lack of follow-on products, there were
other problems in the Imsai Corporation.
Bill Millard had decided that his future was to be in selling
computers rather than manufacturing them. A man named John Martin
had brought him the idea of setting up a franchise computer
business to be called Computer Shack. Martin had actually copied
the idea from Paul Terral's Byte Shops, but had added some ideas from his
experience in the franchise muffler business. Millard incorporated
The Computer Shack franchise business, put Ed Faber in charge,
and started to sell franchises.
The
new business caught the crest of the wave of interest in computer
stores and quickly became a major force in the industry. The
only setback was caused by Radio Shack, which caused a name
change to Computerland. The Computerland stores carried Imsai computers but they also sold Apple, North Star,
and Cromemco. In fact, the Imsai 8080 became one of the less popular computers
in the stores.
Determined
to dominate both the retail franchise and manufacturing ends
of the computer business, Millard forced his Imsai
division to produce a desk top business computer called the
VDP-80. This was an all-in-one machine with the video monitor,
keyboard, disk drives, and computer, all in one cabinet. Millard
had the cabinet built in Europe with an eye to exterior design
and no consideration given to the requirements for the internal
components. The new machine was plagued with problems and in
addition had an unproven dual floppy disk drive made by Persci.
This drive was almost impossible to keep in alignment under
the most favorable conditions. In the furnace inside the VDP-80,
it refused to run properly. Although intensive advertising sold
this computer, Imsai could not afford
to keep up their warranty. There was a quick re-design installing
5 1/4-inch drives to replace the 8-inch Perscis
and changing the name to VDP-40. However, the damage had been
done. The Computer Mart of New York refused to sell the VDP-80
and gave up the Imsai dealership, which had become unimportant anyway.
Millard
had stripped Imsai of all its resources
and put them into Computerland. Bankruptcy
quickly followed for Imsai. While
Computerland went on to become the most important retailer
of Apple and IBM PCs, the foundation crumbled and Imsai disappeared. Many of the assets of Imsai, including the rights to the name, were bought
by Fisher-Fitas, a former sub-contractor
to Imsai. They continued the manufacture
of the original rugged 8080 machines until the parts ran out
and then the Imsai 8080 became history.
Computerland stores prospered as the primary
retailer of IBM computers but, when IBM abandoned the ISA bus
and the clone business started, they fell on hard times. The
franchisers joined in a bitter legal battle with Millard and
became independent of his control.